Duminica aceasta voi fi musafirul Bisericii Rhema din Iași. Abia aștept:
10 Decembrie, ora 16:00
Teatrul Lucafărul, Iași.
Living in Romania, this article really got me thinking: When Should an Overseas Missionary Pay a Bribe? Four views are presented as an answer to the question stated in the title, and Christianity Today offers their readers a start to an answer, yet far from a definite one. Readers, enjoy and try to come up with an answer yourselves.
And the article:
Christianity Today: Widespread corruption presents ethical dilemma for outreach. Four views.
The word “bribe” is ugly, with bad built into its definition. For many, bribes are synonymous with dishonesty, deceit, and corruption. But are all gifts that are meant to curry special favor actually immoral?…Read the whole article on the CT web site using the link above.
If you’ve got some interesting insight, feel free to comment,
…in bearing witness (to all that I have spoken of )? I urge that we can, despite our known and continuing differences about the specifics of salvation process and the place of the church in that process. From the great tradition, or rather from the Scriptures as they have always been read within that tradition, we received shared understanding of RUIN, REDEMPTION, REGENERATION and the reality of fellowship with our risen Saviour, that suffices for the purpose.
– J.I. Packer in C. Colson and R.J. Neuhaus (eds.), Evangelicals and Catholics Together: Toward a Common Mission, Dallas, Word, 1995
Lengthy, yet superbly written, the below article from Religion and Ethics Newsweekly, encapsulates Judy Valente’s interview about America’s evangelicals with Mark Noll, historian and professor of Christian thought at Wheaton College:
Historians usually use two ways of defining evangelical Protestant Christians. One feature is the things that evangelicals historically and traditionally have believed and practiced. Evangelicals usually stress conversion to Jesus Christ. Evangelicals stress the authority of the Bible as their chief religious authority. Evangelicals are activist in some areas of life, principally in trying to share the good news about Jesus. And evangelicals usually stress the death…
Some other great questions from the interview are, as follows:
What are some of the myths about evangelicals?
The truth would be?
What are some of the nuances people might miss about evangelicals, some of the surprising things?
Is there such a thing as an evangelical worldview, a different way of seeing history than many other Americans do?
And the difference between “evangelical” and “fundamentalist”?
What about the emphasis on the Bible as the literal truth, as being literal rather than figurative? Do both groups share that? Or do fundamentalists have that alone?
Why do you think evangelicals have become so much more prominent in recent years than they were 50 years ago?
What do you think has fueled that growth?
You mentioned that evangelicals were able to adapt to culture and to new technology. In what ways did they adapt that others did not?
You say evangelical adaptability has been a positive influence in some ways. But others these days are raising the question: Have evangelicals become too much a part of the culture around them?
In this effort to adjust to modern culture and appeal to larger groups of people, particularly the unchurched, has the evangelical message been watered down? Is this a concern to you?
How would you assess the influence, in politics and culture at large, of evangelicals?
What role do you think evangelicals will play in the upcoming presidential election?
Let’s talk a little about evangelicals and their faith. How do you and others share your faith with people you meet who are not Christian?
Is there any concern that the habits and practices of evangelicals are becoming too much a part of the secular world, particularly young people? It’s hard not to be swept up in the culture that you live in.
How much of a sense do you have, or do evangelicals still have, that they are outside the mainstream? Or are they not becoming more and more a part of the mainstream?
Do you think they are losing somewhat that outsider status — that status as people standing apart from secular culture, almost in judgment of secular culture?
You wrote an entire book called THE SCANDAL OF THE EVANGELICAL MIND about being both an intellectual and an evangelical Christian. To what extent have the issues that you brought up in that book been overcome?
What can you tell me about the Vineyard movement? Where does it fit in on the spectrum of evangelical churches?
You’ve written a lot about the Protestant hymns. What is their significance for the evangelical tradition in America and for evangelical churches?
What about global evangelicalism?
Enjoy the read!
Did you watch it twice? Even before the video had started, I was already planning on watching it twice so that I could observe all the tricks the robot was about to make in order for the human not to win the game.
It was quite amazing to see how a robot makes a human struggle. And this happens every day, especially if you work on a PC (sic!) The human fights his own limitations in trying to beat a robot. Up until the 6th serve, the human seemed to be losing the game and you would not even be shocked about it. Yet, the tricks were not performed by a specially produced and programmed robot, but by the human who has the special gift of creativity. It was all about the unexpected ways of delivering a ball, that the robot was not programmed to face, and that was its weak point. After the first point in favour of the human, you could already see how the next few points were about to be won, and most of them met your expectations.
The one thing the fascinates me is not the precision and the speed of the robot, but he lack of pleasure, excitement and sorrow when winning and/or losing. It was on the face of the human that you could read all that he was experiencing: joy, excitement, wonder, expectancy, sorrow and revenge. The robot, on the other hand, was only there to perform a job and that job was close to perfection, yet not perfect.
What a lesson: I was not produced, I was created. I was not programmed, but left with the ability to choose and create. I was not only given choice, but the ability to react and live the results of my own choices. I was also given the pleasures of life and the sorrow of wrong choices. And all this with a purpose: to chose right and to enjoy the results of a good choice. Forever!
How and what will I choose will determine the very next reactions and decisions in my life. Think about it!